Adoption Is Pro-Gospel Legislation

This article was originally published by America First Journal. Republished with permission by the author.

The parents tremble. The child fidgets. Grandparents beam. The judge fights back a smile. Seldom do we ascribe beauty to a courtroom—except when a child is adopted.

Adoption reflects a culture's deepest beliefs about goodness, truth, and beauty. It is an act of love that shapes identities, offers security, and—in a culture of collapsing birthrates—quite literally helps preserve civilization.

This is precisely why Congress has a moral responsibility to pass the Hospital Adoption Education Act of 2025, otherwise known as H.R. 2892.

H.R. 2892 is a bipartisan bill that ensures expectant mothers are fully informed about all their options—including adoption. The need is real: according to congressional research, 24 percent of Americans say they have considered adopting a child. Eighty percent of women who consider adoption do so after their sixth month of pregnancy. And 81 percent of birth parents report that easy access to objective information is critical when making an adoption decision. And yet, 98.2 percent of nurses have received no professional training in adoption-sensitive care. H.R. 2892 addresses this gap directly, ensuring that healthcare professionals fulfill their ethical duty to provide truly informed consent.

Adoption is a good and beautiful act—but it is not without emotional cost. Many birth mothers experience profound psychological upheaval, often intensified by postpartum depression. Healthcare professionals must be equipped to care for all birth mothers, and especially for those who choose adoption, whose postpartum experience is often distinct and deeply complex.

Adoption also carries lingering social stigmas that too often shape how birth mothers are perceived and treated. Doctors and nurses need continuing education in adoption-sensitive communication—training that addresses stigma, uses respectful and accurate language, and honors the emotional complexity involved. Such training would help ensure that every birth mother is met with dignity and appropriate care throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Amid all this emotional complexity, birth mothers also have a right to accurate information. In many states, for instance, birth mothers can choose the adoptive parents and determine the degree of ongoing contact with their child. These are not small matters—they deserve to be communicated clearly and compassionately.

For Christians, there is another layer of meaning here: pro-adoption legislation is pro-gospel legislation. The cross is the ultimate evidence that God the Father desires to welcome vulnerable people into His family (Ephesians 1:4–5). Christ's resurrection does not merely change a believer's eternal destiny—it transforms their identity. Revelation 2:17 declares that Christ gives His people a new name and a new standing. The Spirit's indwelling secures our full status as heirs with Christ, so that believers stand in complete righteousness before the Father—justified in the Son.

Just as spiritual adoption in Christ reshapes the eternal destiny of the redeemed, earthly adoption reshapes the earthly destiny of a child made in His glorious image.

While not every Christian should adopt, every Christian can champion the cause. One practical way is to raise awareness of legislation like H.R. 2892—a bill poised to bring more moments of hope and beauty into courtrooms across our nation. By supporting policies like this, we help ensure that every adoption story begins with compassion, informed care, and dignity for all involved. In doing so, we affirm that even within the solemn walls of a courtroom, true beauty can flourish—one family at a time.

Dan Trippie, PhD

Dan Trippie is a native of Buffalo, NY. He holds a Ph.D. in ethics from Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary and Mdiv. from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. Dan’s focus of study is in public theology with a special emphasis on religious freedom. Dan seeks to integrate theology into the public square dialogue. Dan and his wife, Gina, high school sweethearts, were married in 1995.

Next
Next

What is the Value of a Life?